Skip to content
Hendl
SOLUTIONS  /  INVESTIGATIONS/ evidence to findings

Every investigation, built on a record you can stand behind.

Hendl's agents gather the evidence, build the chronology and keep every exhibit linked to its source — so your investigators spend their time on the judgement, and the record holds up when it's tested.

2.4×
Case throughput per investigator
100%
Findings linked to source exhibits
7 hrs
Investigator time returned / week

Investigations don't fail on judgement. They fail on the record.

The findings are the part your investigators are good at. The risk sits in everything underneath — scattered evidence, hand-built chronologies and conclusions that are hard to trace back to their sources.

TODAY
Evidence arrives scattered across inboxes and shared drives
Chronologies are assembled by hand in spreadsheets
Interview notes live apart from the exhibits they reference
Disclosure requests are tracked from memory
Findings are hard to trace back to their sources
WITH HENDL
Every document lands in one indexed case record
Agents build and maintain the chronology as evidence arrives
Notes, exhibits and correspondence linked on one timeline
Requests tracked with owners, deadlines and reminders
Every finding cites the exhibits behind it

The whole case file, kept in order for you.

From the first document in to the final report out, agents handle the collection, indexing and cross-referencing — and hand your team a record that's ready to reason over.

Evidence intake

Ingest mailboxes, drives and uploads; every item hashed, indexed and logged on arrival.

Document review

Agents read the corpus, surface what matters and mark what needs a human eye.

Chronology building

A living timeline assembled from the evidence — with gaps flagged, not hidden.

Entity mapping

People, accounts and organisations linked across documents automatically.

Interview support

Briefing packs, question lists and post-interview summaries tied to the record.

Disclosure tracking

Every request, custodian and deadline tracked with reminders and status.

Pattern signals

Unusual timing, missing correspondence and inconsistencies flagged for review.

Findings & reporting

Draft reports where every finding is source-linked and export-ready.

A CASE, EVIDENCE TO FINDINGS

Watch the record build itself.

As evidence arrives, agents review it, place it on the chronology and flag the gaps — then hand your investigator a proposed next step to approve.

INV-2093 · Conduct investigation
Opened 3d ago · 4 custodians
Evidence review
Custodian mailboxes ingested and indexed
1,842 items · hashed and logged
Done
240 documents reviewed against the scope
31 marked relevant, 6 for human review
Done
Chronology drafted from the evidence
Two gaps flagged: 3–9 Apr, 22 Apr
Done
Recommended: interview list of three custodians
Awaiting investigator approval
Review
AIWho approved the March payment?
T. Okafor — approval email of 14 Mar, exhibit 41.
AIAre there gaps in the chronology?
Two — 3–9 April and 22 April. No correspondence recovered.
AIWhich exhibits support finding 2?
Exhibits 12, 41 and 58 — all source-linked in the draft report.
Ask anything about the case — Assistant answers from the evidence record, with exhibit citations.

What investigation teams see.

Based on early deployments
2.4×
Case throughput
per investigator
−45%
Manual evidence handling
collection and indexing
100%
Source-linked findings
every conclusion cited
7 hrs
Investigator time returned
per investigator, per week

Agents assemble. Investigators conclude.

Built for work that ends up in front of a regulator or tribunal — every item is time-stamped, every access is logged, and findings stay with named people.

Privilege & confidentiality

Privileged material marked and walled off; restricted workspaces per case.

Approval gates

Agents pause for a named investigator before any outreach or disclosure.

Complete audit trail

Every item, access and action time-stamped and exportable.

Access controls

Case-level permissions — people see only the cases they are cleared for.

§
Explainable findings

Every conclusion cites the exhibits and reasoning behind it.

Defensible record

A record built to be tested — by a regulator, a tribunal or an ombudsman.

Enterprise security
GDPR & DPA 2018UK / EU data residencyEncryption in transit & at restTenant isolationRole-based accessFull audit trail

Questions investigation leaders ask.

Can Hendl handle privileged material?

Yes. Privileged and confidential items are marked on intake, held in restricted workspaces, and excluded from agent outputs unless a cleared person releases them.

How does evidence get in?

Connect mailboxes, document stores and uploads. Every item is hashed, time-stamped and indexed on arrival, so the chain of custody starts at intake.

Do agents draw conclusions?

No. Agents assemble the record, flag patterns and draft summaries — investigators make the findings, and every finding carries their name.

Will the record stand up externally?

The full case record — sources, actions, access and reasoning — is exportable in a time-stamped, citable form built for regulators and tribunals.

Run your next investigation on a record that stands up.

Start with a single live case — Hendl builds the evidence record alongside your current process, fully supported.

© 2026 Hendl Labs Ltd. All rights reserved.
Services AgreementPrivacy PolicyTrust Center